Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants in the Directorate for Biological Sciences (DDIG) Synopsis of Program: The National Science Foundation awards Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants in selected areas of the biological sciences. Proposals must fall within the scope of any of the clusters in the Division of Environmental NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants from National Science Foundation (NSF), listed on blogger.com - Masters & PhD Grants, Bursaries & Awards Worldwide The Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants funding opportunity is designed to improve the quality of dissertation research. DDRIG awards provide funds for items not normally available through the student's university such as enabling doctoral students to undertake significant data-gathering projects and to conduct field research in settings away from their
Archaeology and Archaeometry | Beta site for NSF - National Science Foundation
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NSF Full Proposal Deadline s due by 5 p. proposer's local time :. The National Science Foundation's Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCSDivision of Social and Economic Sciences SESDivision of Science Resources Statistics SRSand the SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities SMA award grants to doctoral students to improve the quality of dissertation research.
These grants provide funds for items not normally available through the student's university. Additionally, these grants allow doctoral students to undertake significant data-gathering projects and to conduct field research in settings away from their campus that would not otherwise be possible. Proposals are judged on the basis of their scientific merit, including the theoretical importance of the research question and the appropriateness of the proposed data and methodology to be used in addressing the question.
In an effort to improve the quality of dissertation research, many programs in BCS, SES, the Research on Science and Technology Surveys and Statistics Program within SRS, and the Science of Science and Innovation Policy in SMA accept doctoral dissertation improvement grant proposals. Please consult the relevant program's webpage for specific information and contact the program director if necessary.
Geography and Spatial Sciences. Methodology, Measurement, and Statistics. Science, Technology, and Society. Research on Science and Technology Surveys and Statistics Program. Science of Science and Innovation Policy. For a list of cognizant program officers for the programs listed above, please visit the SBE Doctoral Dissertation Contact List.
Estimated Number of Awards: to for the entire SBE Directorate. Organization Limit:. Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:. NSF does not reimburse grantee U. academic institutions for the indirect costs associated with doctoral dissertation research. Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review considerations apply. Please doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Award Conditions: Standard NSF award conditions apply. Reporting Requirements: Standard NSF reporting requirements apply. The National Science Foundation's Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCSDivision of Social and Economic Sciences SESand Division of Science Resources Statistics SRS award grants to doctoral students to improve the quality of dissertation research, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation.
Additionally, these grants allow doctoral students to undertake significant data-gathering projects and to conduct field and archival research in settings away from their campus that would not otherwise be possible. Funds may be used for valid research expenses which include, but are not limited to, conducting field research in settings away from campus that would not otherwise be possible, data collection and sample survey costs, payments to subjects or informants, specialized research equipment, analysis and services not otherwise available, supplies, travel to archives, travel to specialized collections and facilities or field research locations, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation, and partial living expenses for conducting necessary research away from the student's university.
SBE Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants provide supplemental funds for doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation not usually available from the student's U.
academic institution, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation. The awards are not intended to provide the full costs of a student's doctoral dissertation research.
Funds may be used for valid research expenses which include, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation, but are not limited to, conducting field research in settings away from campus that would not otherwise be possible, data collection and sample survey costs, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation to subjects or informants, specialized research equipment, analysis and services not otherwise available, supplies, travel to archives, travel to specialized collections and facilities or field research locations, and partial living expenses for conducting necessary research away from the student's U.
While the Foundation provides support for doctoral dissertation research, the student Co-PI is solely responsible doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation the conduct of such research and preparation of results for publication.
The Foundation, therefore, does not assume responsibility for such findings and their interpretation. This program does not support research with disease-related goals, including research on the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of physical or mental disease, abnormality, or malfunction of human beings, animals or plants. Due to the variation in research techniques and needs across the social, behavioral, and economic sciences, individual programs vary widely in award sizes; please consult the program's webpage or program director for specific information.
Proposer may concurrently submit a doctoral dissertation proposal to other funding organizations; please indicate this in the "Current and Pending Support" section of the NSF proposal, so that NSF may coordinate funding with the other organizations. Full Proposal Instructions: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the guidelines specified in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide GPG.
Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone PUBS or by e-mail from nsfpubs nsf. Current and pending support forms should be submitted for both the PI advisor and Co-PI student. Proposers are reminded to identify the program solicitation number NSF in the program solicitation block on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is critical to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines.
Failure to submit this information may delay processing. Cost Sharing: Cost sharing is not required under this solicitation. Due dates vary across Programs. Proposers are required to prepare and submit all proposals for this program solicitation through use of the NSF FastLane system. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at or e-mail fastlane nsf. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane system.
Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact s listed in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative AOR must electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications see Chapter II, Section C of the Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications.
The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate Doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation program where they will be reviewed if they meet NSF proposal preparation requirements. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal.
These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional.
Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with the proposal. All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board NSB -approved merit review criteria: intellectual merit and the broader impacts of the proposed effort. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
The two NSB-approved merit review criteria are listed below. The criteria include considerations that help define them, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation. These considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which the reviewer is qualified to make judgements.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer individual or team to conduct the project? If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work. To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources? What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning?
How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups e. To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships?
Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society? Mentoring activities provided to postdoctoral researchers supported on the project, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation, as described in a one-page supplementary document, will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts criterion. Integration of Research and Education One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions.
These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives. Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation, Projects, and Activities Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering.
NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports. Dissertation proposals are reviewed by a panel or a panel in combination with ad hoc peer reviewers. Please note that only the programs that evaluate proposals by ad hoc peer reviews ask for the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers. The applicant should check with the cognizant program officer on review procedures specific to that program.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF is striving to be able to tell applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months.
The time interval begins on the doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation or target date, or receipt date, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program Officer's recommendation. A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer, doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation.
In all cases, reviews are treated as confidential documents. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding. In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements for review of doctoral dissertation improvement grants national science foundation, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a grant or other agreement.
Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds.
No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their own risk.
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements.
Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE)
, time: 1:28:05Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants
During a fiscal year, the Linguistics Program expects to recommend (either on its own or jointly with one or more other NSF programs) a total of 25 to 35 Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement (DDRI) awards Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants. The National Science Foundation (NSF) has made an award to APSA to administer the Political Science Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant (DDRIG) program. The total award of the grant is $1,, for a three year period, starting with the Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants competition Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants in the Directorate for Biological Sciences (DDIG) Synopsis of Program: The National Science Foundation awards Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants in selected areas of the biological sciences. Proposals must fall within the scope of any of the clusters in the Division of Environmental
No comments:
Post a Comment