Apr 01, · Using a journal matching technology based on your manuscript title and abstract, the following tools can help you find journals that could be best suited for publishing your systematic review article. You will need also to consult the journal’s aims and scope for further blogger.com: Nedelina Tchangalova Nov 15, · CiteScore: ℹ CiteScore: CiteScore measures the average citations received per peer-reviewed document published in this title. CiteScore values are based on citation counts in a range of four years (e.g. ) to peer-reviewed documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters) published in the same four calendar years, divided by the number of My supervisor wants me to identify potential journals to publish my review article, however, there is so many options that I am finding it hard to narrow it down. Most of the online guidelines
5 Tips for Publishing Your First Academic Article - Inquiries Journal
Put together six months to one year long wait times of journals with crazy high rejection rates and you will know why it is so crucial for you to think through your decision of choosing the right journal. As early-career best journal to publish review article, where you choose to publish your work will impact your career advancement, funding opportunities and professional reputation for years to come.
Getting this wrong can be a huge setback for your career. It is thus important that you analyze each aspect of journal submission instead of relying on one resource as your holy grail, be it word-of-mouth, journal finder tools, or other resources available. In this extensive guide, we provide you with everything you need to analyze the quality, credibility, author experience best journal to publish review article the overall reputation of journals — all in one place.
Pubishing in a good peer-reviewed journal is the ultimate goal for most research projects. Over 34, scholarly journals fall into this category and choosing the best journal for your work is like finding the needle in a haystack already. Predatory publishers often game Google Scholar and Academia.
edu systems to get access to recently published papers and their authors. It is also common to receive unsolicited emails from such publishers to turn a paper into a complete book, or to draw from your recently published journal article to present as a keynote at some obscure conference.
Most experienced authors understand the way the industry works way too well to fall for such scams. But first-time authors are under a lot of pressure to start publishing soon and are also unfamiliar with the esteemed journals in their discipline. They are the ones who fall prey to such emails. Red Flags to Best journal to publish review article Predatory Publishers.
No standard identifiers, like ISSNs or DOIs — Publishers whose sole purpose is to scam people to make more money do not have standard identifiers, like DOIs or ISSNs.
Some who actually do, often do not know how to use them properly, best journal to publish review article. Spend some time googling the ISSN or journal title for a few minutes and carefully read through the results.
You should be able to spot a scam pretty quickly. Sometimes a quick google check of the email ID from which you received the message can also help find posts on forums where others have already mentioned about the scammer. The scope of the journal is too wide — Scholarly peer-reviewed journals often focus on a particular niche under a broad discipline. For example, Mediterranean Politics published by Taylor and Francis focuses on research related to international relations and contemporary politics in the Mediterranean Sea and areas surrounding it.
No transparency about article processing charges or APS — Many international journals now charge APS, especially when it is an open access journal. But mostly the fee is payable when the journal has already gone through the entire process of getting your paper peer reviewed, copyedited, and typeset for free, and have been accepted for publication.
An important distinction to make here is that all reputed journals, even if they charge APS, will reveal the chargeable amount beforehand on their website.
With predatory publishers however, even if they mention about APS beforehand, best journal to publish review article, they mostly do not reveal the exact amount upfront. Another malignant practice is for such publishers to charge APS and still require authors to transfer and retain the copyrights of their work to the journal.
Some even ask for it at the time of submission of manuscripts. Poor online best journal to publish review article — Dead links, gruesome grammatical errors, unlicensed images, too many ads and misspellings are all indicators of a non-credible publisher website.
If their brand image is not important to them, imagine what you can expect from them for your paper? The journal is not well-indexed — Reputed journals are well-indexed and have widespread coverage in the databases of library holdings, like Google Scholar searches, best journal to publish review article, EBSCOHost and Ingenta and others, since they are recommended by peer groups and are recognized for their good standing. SCOPUS, Directory of Open Access Journals DOAJthe International Bibliography of the Social Sciences IBSSISI Web of Sciencethe Norwegian List, SSherpa-Romeo, WorldCAT, and ciELO in South Africa are all well-known indexes.
While a library or Google Scholar is not counted as a database, you can always check DOAJ. Officials of the journal use email addresses of a free email supplier like Gmail — Take this one with a pinch of salt.
Sometimes good journals hire independent editors or the journal itself might not be housed under one university. In such cases, email providers, like Gmail or Yahoo prove to be a good alternative as you can avail great cloud storage at no cost. Unless you notice some other red flags along with this one, use your discretion in how you want to proceed. A publisher with no online submission platform and only a gmail address to send submissions is another warning sign.
If you still have any doubts that the offer you received in your inbox is a hoax, check out this list for more details. SELECTING THE RIGHT JOURNAL — FACTORS TO CONSIDER.
Submitting a manuscript to a wrong journal is one of the most common mistakes made by both early-career and experienced researchers. Novice researchers exploring broader research subjects are sometimes unfamiliar with reputed journals in their field.
Experienced researchers, on the other hand, become too comfortable with publishing in the same journals over and again even when they can now find better publication opportunities and reach a wider audience through open-access or electronic-only journals. Hence, regardless the stage of your career, you will be revisiting the question of choosing the right journal multiple times during your career.
The parameters you need to consider might change over a period of time with the advancement in technology changing the way journals operate, but for now, you can stick to these key points in For example — Nature Reviews Immunology website indicates that they accept in-depth coverage of all areas of immunology, from fundamental mechanisms to applied aspects.
This will give you the confidence to know if this journal is the right choice for you. Authors guidelines. If the journal charges any submission fee or article processing charges, you will find it under this section as well. Poorly presented or proofread papers often make reviewers and editors assume that their research is also poor and are thus not worth publishing. It is important that the research is also well-written.
So authors whose first language is not English are especially recommended to seek help from professional academic editing services, like Editage to make sure that their manuscript meets the global standards of publication. While most researchers shortlist journals after they have finished writing their manuscript, you can probably now see why it might not be the best approach.
Reformatting the whole paper after you have finished writing is no fun. Keeping specifications of a journal in mind while writing will save you a lot of time and unnecessary trouble towards the end.
Besides, having a target journal in mind will increase your chances of acceptance as you will now have more clarity about the target audience, best journal to publish review article, purpose and context of what you are writing. Time to publish. In an ideal world, journals should be as accountable to authors as authors are to journals. But the real world operates differently. Many of us have heard about that one friend who is completely clueless about the status of his manuscript that he submitted over a year ago.
Unfortunately, the tales of loss of time due to submitting manuscripts to inadequate journals are as old as time. Any mistakes made in the journal selection process can slow down the progression of your career.
Good journals take a minimum of four months to come back to you with a response if your paper has been sent for a peer review. If your paper has been rejected, best journal to publish review article, you should hear about it within 4—6 weeks after best journal to publish review article. Reputed journals work hard to publish papers within 9—12 months of submission. But high profile journals do have longer wait times, mostly because of the volume of submissions they receive, and their rejection rates are also higher.
Having said that, you must look into how many issues are published by a journal annually. The more they publish, the lesser would be the time taken by them to publish your paper. Special editions get lesser submissions relatively and makes it easier for your paper to be considered and published, if it fits the criteria.
As early-career researchers, you might have freaked out when you got to know that it can take six month to a year to get a manuscript published. But it is mostly the lack of understanding of how journals operate that makes it difficult to imagine how publishing a paper can take so much time, best journal to publish review article. When you submit a paper, it is usually read by an initial editor, who then assigns an associate editor who is knowledgeable in your field of research.
This editor is responsible for finding at least two peer reviewers who agree to offer feedback for your paper in the stipulated time frame, which takes 30 to 60 days. In many cases, reviewers are unable to get back to the journal in time, which delays the process. After receiving the reviews on your paper, the associate editor then has to take a decision about your paper.
If your paper is rejected, you will need to start finding another journal. Otherwise, the editor might send back the paper with recommended revisions, best journal to publish review article, which can take another three months. Once you submit the paper with changes, it will again be sent to the editor for re-review. This takes a couple of more weeks. The paper is then copyedited, sent back to you for author checking, and typeset before it is published, either online or in print.
Any journal that claims it can publish your paper in six weeks is a scam. Journal Impact Factor JIF. Journal Impact Factor JIF basically shows the number of citations received by journal articles in proportion to the number of citation articles it published in the past 2—5 years. It has become the default metric to assess the reputation and quality of a best journal to publish review article and is held in high regard by authors, institutions and employers alike.
Getting jobs, grants etc. is all a whole lot easier when you are a published author in a high IF journal. To know about IF in more detail, you can check out this quick video by Clarivate Analytics. Should you go for a journal that attracts a more appropriate target audience for your paper, or the one that has better JIF?
This is a common debate in the scientific community with mixed opinions. Some researchers strongly recommend that you prefer your audience regardless of the impact factor of the journal as it significantly increases the chances of your paper being evaluated by appropriate reviewers. Also, when your research is read by the right audience, best journal to publish review article, your paper gets cited more often which increases your H-Index.
Many researchers, however, question the recognition enjoyed by JIF in the community. Some publishing practices by high IF journals add more to this debate. Review articles, for example, are known to get higher citations than research articles. As a result, many journals publish more review articles that help them maintain a higher JIF for years, without having to publish any solid research articles for a long time.
In fact, it is important to note that in some core subjects, where the number of researchers are also low, JIF will also be low. You must do a relative analysis of JIF in your particular field when choosing a journal. In such cases, it is also recommended that you prefer journals that attract your target audience rather than JIF.
Thus choosing a journal solely based on its JIF is not the best strategy. For new authors, it is recommended to take a balanced approach in choosing the best journal.
How to write a review paper? Learn from the Scratch. Know about benefits of a review.
, time: 6:46Review Papers - Recent Review Articles - Elsevier
Apr 01, · Using a journal matching technology based on your manuscript title and abstract, the following tools can help you find journals that could be best suited for publishing your systematic review article. You will need also to consult the journal’s aims and scope for further blogger.com: Nedelina Tchangalova Sep 10, · No journal is going to take interest in your work if it does not present new or novel ideas. To get your work published, you need to say something new without saying something that calls your credibility into question.. Successful academic articles do two things: they position themselves within existing scholarship (often in a ‘literature review’ section, although strategic authors don’t Sep 27, · All journal articles from the 30 countries published between and in journals listed in National Library of Medicine (NLM)’s Abridged Index Medicus (AIM) or “Core Clinical” Journal Titles subset were also searched for publication types labeled as meta-analysis, systematic review, clinical trial, and randomized controlled blogger.com by: 34
No comments:
Post a Comment